After all, Apple doesnt really manufacture Apple products.
Jobs went on to say, " i also means some other things to us" and displayed a presentation slide with the keywords: internet individual instruct inform inspire, you can even view video of this event.
Apple versus Goldman Sachs is very interesting, but I think this part of the account is a mistake: Unlike some corporations, Apple doesnt record on its balance sheet much of the value of its patents and other intellectual property the look and feel of the.
I would love to see Apple return to the idea that it makes some of the world's best consumer devices, but also the computational infrastructure of choice t mobile verlengen met kado for the professional world, and that's something that might breathe life, if not a whole third lung, into.That is to say, allowing the device to sort of grow into the thing that it should.Matthew Yglesias, jan 20, 2011, 6:30 pm, john Cassidy.The iPhone is continuing at a yearly pace, though with sales decreasing, how can Apple turn this ship around?But the other thing that I think Apple could do would be to pay more attention, once again, to the professional world.So I think what Apple needs to do is introduce a new category or two.It's up to the folks who make the software that runs on it, the applications.There was a kind of almost palpable moment when Apple computers went from being the recognized and Apple-supported device of choice for professionals, let's say in the media industry, to the next moment when media creators were effectively ignored by Apple.What Apple has is intellectual property operating systems.You can see this by looking at the makers of Android devices, who get software free from Google but earn much smaller profit margins than Apple does.
It makes tangible things iMacs, iPhones, iPads that millions of people want to buy, and for which they are willing to pay a premium price.
(As far as I know, Goldman doesnt capitalize its intellectual capital, such as it is, either.).its because the phone manufacturing business, as such, just isnt that profitable precisely because nobody has monopoly power in building phones.That is to say, very specifically, if you're solving some of the hardest problems, in UI, in software, because you're effectively working for or working with people who are creating professional work, who are undertaking professional work, then you're solving the hardest problems that.These were produced as Steve Jobs wanted a pro and consumer model of a desktop and portable computer.I think it's fair to say that once a new product that also introduces a new category gets launched, if you're Apple, the next few years with product refinements are the equivalent of finishing the inflation of the balloon.Note that depending on the number of suggestions we receive, this can take anywhere from a few hours to a few days.
Thank you for helping to improve wisegeek!
The main reason why Apple is so much more profitable than Goldman is a reassuring one.