Your contribution may be indirect.
Let the hoe maak je bessensap nerds keep their lunch money, and you rule the world.
Fortunately there is a natural fit between smallness and solving hard problems.The top 5 of programmers lekkere wraps maken probably write 99 of the good software.But you can't get very far by trading things directly with the people who need them.It's also obvious to programmers that there are huge variations in the rate at which wealth is created.Money is not wealth.You can maybe guess what happened next.
You can't decide, for example, that you'd like to work just two or three times as hard, and get paid that much more.
Suppose another multiple of three.
You know in the back of your mind what's the right thing to do, and this trick merely forces you to acknowledge.McDonald's, for example, grew big by designing a system, the McDonald's franchise, that could then be reproduced at will all over the face of the earth.And if someone was lazy, the others would be more likely to notice and complain.For most of human history it has not even been the most common.Upside must be balanced by downside, so if there is big potential for gain there must also be a terrifying possibility of loss.In both cases, what it all comes down to is users.This, as we found, causes CEOs to take red-eyes.But if wealth is the important thing, why does everyone talk about making money?So all other things being equal, a very able person in a big company is probably getting geboortebedankjes zelf maken a bad deal, because his performance is dragged down by the overall lower performance of the others.
What made the Dutch rich in 1600 was the discovery of shipbuilding and navigation techniques that enabled them to dominate the seas of the Far East.
Take away the incentive of wealth, and technical innovation grinds to a halt.
Certainly Bill is smart and dedicated, but Microsoft also happens to have been the beneficiary of one of the most spectacular blunders in the history of business: the licensing deal for DOS.